The Charlotte Observer today reported that Charleston 
again was voted the No. 1 city in the United States   to visit in the annual  Readers' Choice Awards by Conde Nast Traveler
-- for the fourth year.
Also, Charleston 
finished in second place in the Readers' Choice Awards for Top 25 Cities in the
World.
But a closer look at the other cities in both lists may be
informative.
Top 5 Cities in the United States 
1. Charleston 
2. Santa Fe ,
 N.M. 
3. New Orleans 
4. San Francisco 
5. Chicago 
Top Cities in the World
1. Florence ,
 Italy 
2. Charleston 
3. Budapest ,
 Hungary 
4. Cape Town ,
 South Africa 
5. San Miguel de Allende, Mexico 
6. Prague ,
 Czech Republic 
7. Rome 
8. Siem Reap, Cambodia 
9. Barcelona ,
 Spain 
10. Santa Fe ,
 N.M. 
11. Krakow ,
 Poland 
12. Luang Prabang, Laos 
13. Bangkok ,
 Thailand 
14. Beirut ,
 Lebanon 
15. Vienna ,
 Austria 
16. Siena ,
 Italy 
17. New Orleans 
18. Quebec City ,
 Canada 
19. Sydney ,
 Australia 
20. San Francisco 
21. Chiang Mai ,
 Thailand 
22. Salzburg ,
 Austria 
23. Chicago 
24. Bruges ,
 Belgium 
25. Kyoto ,
 Japan 
Why is "Top Cities in the United States " limited to only
five destinations? While a good bit of the contents of the magazine (these and
other best-of lists are in the November issue, on the shelves Oct. 26) is usually geared toward luxury and exotic travel, the five-city limit seems restrictive for a
magazine based in America 
and written for American readers. 
With the exception of Santa Fe ,
N.M. , the other winners in the United States 
list also appear on the  world list. 
And with the exception of Santa Fe , the domestic destinations chosen are
not surprising. In fact, they could qualify for been-there-done-that honors for
most travelers.
But look at some
of the international selections, like exotic Luang Prabang, Laos , or  Beirut , Lebanon  
-- a fascinating place that was a jet-set destination before decades of civil
war. Who would have imagined those places (or even rustic Siena , Italy  )
on the top 25 list?
Think it through: Could fabled Florence ,
Italy  -- shown at the top of
this post -- really be the only city in the world more worth visiting than Charleston ?
Be aware that anyone could take any of the Conde Nast Traveler's online polls.
It' ain't just readers, folks. 
Maybe  Conde Nast
Traveler poll-takers aren't overly curious about trying different or unusual destinations
in the United States 
 -- or are poll-takers on a mission. Or just don't get out much. And perhaps poll-takers' international choices are more of a wish list than anything.

1 comments:
Charlotte often gets accused of being a city full of insecure people who aspire to put it on a fake, undeserving pedestal. I've often disagreed. And then the Observer publishes a story like this, that for the life of me I totally don't understand. Why try to minimize such a wonderful accolade for Charleston? The only conclusion is jealousy.
Post a Comment